Skip to content

Conversation

@evenstensberg
Copy link
Member

Summary

Adds roadmap for 2026

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

new docs

Did you add tests for your changes?

N/A

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

If relevant, what needs to be documented once your changes are merged or what have you already documented?

N/A

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 4, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
webpack-js-org Ready Ready Preview, Comment Feb 9, 2026 11:07am

Request Review

Copy link
Member

@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this is in draft, feel free to ignore if early feedback isn't needed yet! 🙂

@bjohansebas
Copy link
Member

bjohansebas commented Feb 7, 2026

@UlisesGascon see #7780 for more changes and provide feedback!

@UlisesGascon
Copy link
Member

thanks @bjohansebas I will focus on #7780 👍

Co-authored-by: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com>
@evenstensberg
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for co-reviewing @UlisesGascon will have a look tomorrow!

…7780)

* docs(blog): update roadmap for 2026 with CSS Modules support details

* docs(blog): add details on universal target support

* docs(blog): integrate HTML module support as entry points without plugins

* docs(blog): expand TypeScript support by eliminating loader requirements

* docs(blog): add support for Deno and Bun

* docs(blog): enhance support for Node, Deno, and Bun with a runtime-agnostic architecture

* docs(blog): simplify asset minimization by consolidating multiple plugins into a single minimizer-webpack-plugin

* docs(blog): update section headers

* docs(blog): update roadmap details for universal target and ESM output progress

* docs(blog): enhance design and visual identity with new assets for projects and merchandise

* docs(blog): enhance documentation accuracy by enabling auto-generation from webpack types and schemas

* docs(blog): add section on community outreach and engagement to enhance developer connections

* docs(blog): streamline webpack's development experience with improved dev tooling and CLI enhancements

* docs(blog): add GSoC mentorship section to highlight student engagement and open source sustainability

* docs(blog): add Multithreading API section to outline performance improvements and ongoing design discussions

* docs(blog): add section on donations and sponsorships to emphasize funding importance for webpack maintenance

* docs(blog): add section on lazy barrel optimization to explore performance improvements inspired by Rspack

* docs(blog): update roadmap for Webpack 6 preparation, highlighting core improvements, testing priorities, and performance benchmarks

* docs(blog): refine language and formatting in roadmap for 2026, enhancing clarity and readability

* docs(blog): enhance runtime compatibility section, detailing webpack's support for alternative JavaScript runtimes and intelligent module handling

* docs(blog): add links to discussions on experimental CSS support and universal target for cross-runtime compatibility

* docs(blog): move section

* docs(blog): update roadmap for 2026, enhancing clarity and excitement about upcoming features

* chore: revise text

Co-authored-by: Sebastian Beltran <bjohansebas@gmail.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Even Stensberg <evenstensberg@gmail.com>
@evenstensberg
Copy link
Member Author

@copilot review this pr

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Feb 9, 2026

@evenstensberg I've opened a new pull request, #7802, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.

@evenstensberg evenstensberg marked this pull request as ready for review February 9, 2026 10:47
snitin315
snitin315 previously approved these changes Feb 9, 2026
@nitin-kumar-deel
Copy link

CI check is failing for one invalid link, can you check?

@evenstensberg
Copy link
Member Author

PTAL

Copy link
Member

@alexander-akait alexander-akait left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bjohansebas Can you look at this too? Thanks

Copy link
Member

@bjohansebas bjohansebas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, nothing blocking

@evenstensberg evenstensberg merged commit c03ec44 into main Feb 9, 2026
8 checks passed
@evenstensberg evenstensberg deleted the roadmap-2026 branch February 9, 2026 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants